Skip Nav

Please turn JavaScript on and reload the page.

Not what you're looking for?

❶In this case, the structure and attitudes will remain the same. When this happens, there is a transformation in how different constitutional ideas are interpreted and utilized.

Browse by Recent Decisions

Browse United States Supreme Court Opinions
Essays on Supreme court cases
Popular Topics

United States Supreme Court ruling on same sex marriage. The paper also examines how that decision impacted management policy decisions in terms of public safety administration. An examination of the ruling's overall impact on public policy is also given. Background knowledge on same sex marriage For the majority of Americans, the matter of same sex marriage may have first come to their knowledge when it burst into the political limelight in late At this time, Massachusetts' highest court ruled that the state had no authority or grounds on which to deny lesbian and gay couples the right to marriage.

In the next few months after the ruling in the state same sex marriage ceremonies were conducted in many counties and cities across the United States U. This brought a lot of…… [Read More]. Supreme Court Second Amendment Case. District of Columbia v. Heller Case Brief Case Facts: The District of Columbia Code prohibited carrying an unregistered firearm and banned the registration of handguns through its provisions.

However, the provisions granted the chief of police the liberty to grant one-year licenses for handguns. Additionally, the Code required individuals owning legitimately registered firearms to keep them unloaded and disassembled or with locked trigger unless they were in business places or being utilized for legalized recreational activities. A special police officer in Washington, D. He applied for a one-year registration license from the city of Washington for a handgun he wanted to keep at home.

Based on the provisions of the District of Columbia Code, Heller's application was rejected. Consequently, he sued the District of Columbia on the premise that the provisions of this Code violated the Second Amendment. Philosophy and Impact of the Death of Scalia Owing to Justice Scalia's disruptive nature, a number of impolite social media posts, op-eds and tweets are expected from parties who were usually not in agreement with his philosophy.

Despite the presence of other "conservative" Justices, Antonin Scalia's aggressive and frequently insulting views either infuriated the opposition or made individuals who agreed with him feel immensely superior and triumphant. I personally believe he can be rightfully counted among the best orators in American history and also the best writer ever among Supreme Court Justices. With respect to the Court's future, numerous diverse responses on the part of politicians are to be expected in the near future Burrus, My hope and prediction is that…… [Read More].

Supreme Court Established in Analyzing the Constitutionality. Supreme Court established in analyzing the constitutionality of punishment? List and discuss at least three of them.

The only specific mention of definition of legally administrable punishment in the U. Constitution is that the punishment not be cruel and unusual, a vague semantic term that has proved fertile ground for both opponents and proponents of the death penalty. Capital punishment, however, was declared unconstitutional in Furman v.

This was not because it meted out death to a defendant. Rather, it was the grounds that it was administered in a cruel and unusual fashion. Thus it was in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U. Also, Georgia's capital punishment laws were meted out in an unclearly defined fashion that was overly subjective, and according to sociological data submitted to the court, seemed to unfairly penalize African-Americans.

It was also thus in violation of the equal protection clause…… [Read More]. Supreme Court has ruled that soliciting money in a busy airport is something that the government can stop because it is so disruptive.

What other activities do you think the government could prevent because they are too disruptive? It's a little hard to justify how the Supreme Court found asking for solicitations in an airport to be "too disruptive," because the person being solicited simply has to say "No thanks," and go on his or her way. If the car in front of us has to fish for money, they can delay progress through the intersection, which could lead to accidents.

That seems like far more of a disruption, and yet it seems to fall within the law. It would seem, based on the airport ruling, that if soliciting in an airport can be banned, then collecting money in intersections could…… [Read More].

Winship was decided by the Burger Court in , Docket number Section b of the New York Family Court Act provided that determination of a juvenile's guilt differs from an adult defendant, requiring only a "preponderance of evidence" and not evidence "beyond a reasonable doubt.

Winship appealed, and the appeal was rejected and later sent to the Supreme Court, which granted certiorari and deemed "preponderance of evidence" methods unconstitutional based primarily on the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause.

The outcome of the case strengthens the burden of proof requirements for all criminal cases, juvenile or not. However, juvenile defendants are…… [Read More]. Its Past, Present and Future In almost all cases, the Miranda ruling of applies to police interviews with criminal suspects, although other Supreme Court decisions extend some of the rights to legal counsel and prevention of self-incrimination to public and private employers.

According to the Supreme Court, the Miranda Warnings must be given prior to questioning to all persons who have been arrested and are in police custody, although one loophole "permits the police to question suspects without giving them their Miranda rights in those settings where it is unclear whether custody is present" Wrightsman and Pitman In addition, suspects might not understand all these rights, especially because local and state police forces around the United States use hundreds of different versions of these rather than one standard set of warnings.

At times, police training manuals also advise officers how to avoid giving the warnings or…… [Read More]. The court deals with transitions of power by maintaining the established traditions and principles from the Constitution. This is used to ensure that case precedent is respected and to provide stability for the entire political system. As the basic guarantees of the Constitution will not change and cannot be adjusted based upon a new party coming to power.

In this case, the structure and attitudes will remain the same. This is from the institution and its practices remaining in place. Koopmans, Neubauer, Oakley, However, the courts will be impacted by these changes to a certain extent.

This will…… [Read More]. Supreme Court's Recent Decision to Ban the. Supreme Court's recent decision to ban the execution of mentally challenged individuals raises important ethical issues.

Judges must be able to determine if a person is indeed mentally challenged. Accordingly, an analysis of the ethical principles underlying the issue is useful. Ultimately, a combination of both deontological and teleological approaches may provide the best ethical guidelines for such a complex issue.

The ethical factors involved in handing down any death sentence are complex. This is especially true when the accused is a mentally challenged individual. In the American criminal justice system, the court must be assured that an accused individual is fully responsible for their actions in order to hold responsible for their crime.

In other words, in order to…… [Read More]. Supreme Court the Justices of. Tribe refers to what Ronald Dworkin says later in the book. Dworkin holds that everyone is an originalist now but that they are not seeking what the lawmakers expected but what they meant to say in their law, suggesting perhaps that they may not be writing laws as clearly as could be or that the vagaries of language often make it difficult to do so without some form of originalist mind set.

Tribe points out that what both originalists and textual critics are doing is to try to determine what is intended over what is expected, meaning that a law could be written to say one thing but would have unintended consequences just the same. Tribe also does…… [Read More]. Supreme Court Concurring Dissent South.

If this is the idea that we convey here today what is going to stop the imposition of regulations in other areas of the State's social and economic life just because Congress feels that there might be a relationship to highway use or safety.

In the end this is going to allow Congress to effectively be able to regulate almost any area of a State's social, political, or economic life on the theory that use of the interstate transportation system is somehow improved. The bigger question is whether or not this infringement upon the State's rights, which have been afforded to them by the Constitution, is going to stop with this or are we going to see it spill over into other areas.

I feel that setting this precedence is only going to open the door for further abuses and violations of the State's rights as they have been given.

Supreme Court and Merrick Garland. The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Although it is not certain what Bickel meant by making that phrase, it grew to have a life of its own. Those that consider democratic majoritarianism of great political value may see this aspect of judicial review as challenging.

However, in the days when civil rights were nonexistent and people were having their personal rights violated, this aspect of judicial review provided the push to change laws, and inevitably, change society. Therefore, a majority of…… [Read More]. Supreme Court's Recent Decision to. Thus, the availability of handguns not only results in a surprisingly large amount of deaths each year, but also those deaths disproportionately affect juveniles and the mentally ill.

If hand guns were unavailable to the population, juvenile murders would be less likely to occur, as would accidental discharges resulting in death and suicide. Because of these statistics and the lives that were lost or severely altered due to gun violence and gun accidents, a federal gun ban is necessary. In addition to death and injury, public access to firearms results in an increased rate of crime.

Although this problem is of a serious nature, it has been around, and left unaddressed, since the Civil ar Deconde This is especially true in regards to juvenile crime. As already mentioned, the increase and decrease in juvenile homicides was linked to an increase and decrease in gun-related deaths "Juveniles and Guns".

Court Case Reversals General and Subcontractors. With the Supreme Court's decision, the general contractor's argument was validated and the lower court's decision reversed in the general contractor's favor. Essentially, the illegal subcontract was deemed invalid due to its illegality and therefore had no standing and the subcontractor was not entitled to any payment. The Court also stated that licenses are needed by construction labor brokers -- otherwise they are not allowed to represent clients or perform construction work.

The Court had to define what was meant by labor brokers in this instance and it even pointed…… [Read More]. Supreme Court of U S Has. From the study of treatment for mothers on crack, 50 experts in drug dependency as well as addicted women identify components which they believe are important in the treatment of women effectively.

Some of the features that they had identified that are always not present within the current programs are: As evident in the finding of the study, there is preference within experts and women for a program that combines medical, drug treatment and therapeutic services for the child and the mother, job training and education, long-term…… [Read More].

Supreme Court In the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education in , the United States Supreme Court overturned the "separate but equal" standard adopted by the Plessy v. Board of Education passed, American public schools were segregated. Board of Education transformed American society by outlawing racial segregation. Now that American schools are integrated, the Brown v. Board of Education decision seems immutable. However, the decision potentially represents an overstepping of the Judicial Branch's power.

While most people would agree that the decision of Brown v. Board of Education was absolutely mandatory, others would note that from a purely rational standpoint, the Supreme Court overstepped its role as an interpretive body. In its reasoning, the Court relies on the research conclusion of psychologists as one of the bases of its decision. Although psychology may be considered to be a "soft" science, it is…… [Read More].

Criminal Justice Supreme Court Decisions. The plaintiffs were disabled Tennesseans who could not access the upper floors in state courthouses.

Tennessee argued that the Eleventh Amendment banned the suit, and filed a motion to dismiss the case. It relied chiefly on Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett , in which the Supreme Court held that Congress had, in endorsing certain provisions of the ADA, unconstitutionally repealed the supreme immunity of the States by letting people sue the States for discrimination on the foundation of disability. Garrett had held that Congress had not met the congruent-and-proportional test, in that it had not collected enough proof of discrimination on the basis of disability to give good reason for the repeal of…… [Read More].

United States Supreme Court Decision. However, this Court also recognizes that mental illness oftentimes differs from other immutable characteristics, such as mental retardation and age, in that a defendant oftentimes has the ability to control mental illness through medical interventions.

Though there are serious questions regarding Panetti's competency to stand trial, much less his competency to represent himself in that trial, there simply does not appear to be any evidence that he was insane at the time of the murders. Panetti engaged in preparations that were rationally aimed at accomplishing the murder of his in-laws, but was able to refrain from killing his wife and child.

In addition, he engaged in a stand-off with police that resulted in him escaping the stand-off without being killed and…… [Read More]. Supreme Court might have held the status of this particular land and the resulting court decision to different standards and might have even reversed decisions of law however, the failure of this point to be addressed in the previous petition barred this point from being addressed by the court in the latter decision.

Oneida Indian Nation of New York et al. Argued January 11, - Decided March 29, Online available at http: Grant, Alexis Indian Sovereign: Medill News Journalism Service. On the Docket Term. Oneida Indian Nation of…… [Read More]. The Supreme Court of the United States There are currently nine Justices on the Supreme Court of the United States, one Chief Justice and Eight Associate Justices; although in the past the number has varied and recent attempts to change this number have been rejected.

The longest Associate Justice currently serving in the Court is Justice Anton Scalia, who was appointed by President eagan and has been on the Court since , more than 24 years. Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, also appointed by eagan, is the second longest serving Justice on the current court, and has served for a little over 23 years. Bush in and has served for…… [Read More].

Clause 2 of the United States Constitution outlines the process whereby the President of the United States is entrusted with the responsibility of selecting the Supreme Court Justices: The general public cannot be trusted to make decisions this important with proper care and consideration.

The most recent election of Donald Trump further proves this to be the case. Even though presidential appointments are problematic in their own way, they still remain the best solution to protect the system of checks and balances. The recent fiasco with the opposition government stymying the President's Supreme Court nominees shows that…… [Read More]. Death Penalty the Supreme Court. Although that case involved jury selection, the Court established a standard for alleging racial discrimination in prosecution.

The Court held that the defendant has to show that he is a member of a cognizable racial group, that the prosecutor has acted in a manner having a discriminatory effect, and that the procedure in place allows those who choose to discriminate the leeway to do so. Once a defendant has established a prima facie showing of discrimination, the State then has the burden of proving race-neutrality. The clear reasoning of the Batson decision would suggest that since Bass could show that he is an African-American, that African-Americans are disproportionately subject to the death penalty, and that the decision whether to charge a defendant with the death penalty is left to the discretion of the prosecutor, that he has established a prima facie case…… [Read More].

Canadian Supreme Court Decision. Let such programs fund themselves through private charitable contributions. If they're justified they'll survive. Laws and policies should be reformed so they protect all the rights and due process for both men and women equally.

In concluding, justice and fairness can only be attained and preserved where we rely on the judgment of people as jurors. A great deal of propaganda can be created these days to force people to think in a way they normally - and healthfully -- wouldn't. The abuse syndrome defense has gone beyond fairness. It's acceptance has triggered an enormous amount of unfairness in society -- aside from what the propanganda would have you know. Alvarez-Machain that "forcible abduction of a foreign national does not prohibit his trial in a U.

Court" dealt a body blow to international law, the implications of which are still being felt. Small wonder, therefore, that the Court's majority decision was considered unjust by international human rights organizations and even by three of Supreme Court's own judges, led by Justice Stevens, who dissented strongly.

I agree with Judge Steven's dissenting opinion for the reasons explained in this essay. As pointed out by Justice Stevens in his dissenting opinion, allowing kidnapping of people from the territory of a foreign country, just because there is no express provision disallowing such an act in a treaty, is strange logic. By an extension of this logic every act, whether legal or illegal, moral or immoral, not mentioned…… [Read More]. Former Supreme Court Justice Potter. During the trail, the prosecution is liable to produce sufficient evidence against the culprit, and it has to be proven that misrepresentation was false, but that the thief knew of the falsity.

The opinions and puffing are not included in false pretense. False Pretense also includes the shift of title. In the case of larceny by trick, the culprit deceives to deprive the owner of possession, not title.

Therefore false pretense is taken much different from larceny by trick, and the implication is taken separately. False Pretense is basically treated as an act of Theft.

The act of false pretense is applied to the defendant, who obtained any chattel, money or valuable security from any other person with intent to defraud.

Trespass is going beyond the limit of what is considered…… [Read More]. Michigan vs Tyler the Supreme Court Decided. This came as a response to an accusation of "conspiracy to burn real property," where the prosecutors had collected and used evidence of numerous days after the firefighting operations. An examination of the ruling's overall impact on public policy is also given. Background knowledge on same sex marriage For the majority of Americans, the matter of same sex marriage may have first come to their knowledge when it burst into the political limelight in late At this time, Massachusetts' highest court ruled that the state had no authority or grounds on which to deny lesbian and gay couples the right to marriage.

In the next few months after the ruling in the state same sex marriage ceremonies were conducted in many counties and cities across the United States U. This brought a lot of…… [Read More]. Changes in Supreme Court Philosophies. The ehnquist Court A common philosophical debate within the legal community is when the approach advocated by so-called 'conservative' justices often called strict constructionism is pitted against more 'liberal' and freer interpretations of constitutional words and history.

Throughout much of the 20th century, it was often said that the more liberal interpreters of the Constitution were 'winning the war' in regards to this issue, thanks to the presiding intelligence of Chief Justice Earl Warren. The decisions of the Warren Court reflected its deep concern for the individual, no matter how lowly"…… [Read More]. The modern crusade for banning of capital punishment started in the 18th century with the writings of Montesquieu and also Voltaire.

Some of the nations which took a lead in abolishing capital punishment are Venezuela in , San Marino in and Costa ica in Supreme Court quashed state death penalty laws. But again in , the Court restored the death penalty following the espousal of new procedures.

Since till , to persons were sentenced to death every year, however, in the last three years; the number of death sentences has come down remarkably. Among the 50 states, 13 states…… [Read More]. Equal Protection the Supreme Court. The true spirit and meaning of the amendments, as we said in the Slaughter-House Cases 16 Wall. At the time when they were incorporated into the Constitution, it required little knowledge of human nature to anticipate that those who had long been regarded as an inferior and subject race would, when suddenly raised to the rank of citizenship, be looked upon with jealousy and positive dislike, and that State laws might be enacted or enforced to perpetuate the distinctions that had before existed.

Discriminations against them had been habitual. Furthermore, while the Court's decision was based on Strauder's right to an impartial jury, the Court believed that all-white juries were discriminatory against the potential jury pool.

The Importance of Women on the Supreme Court. At present, there have only ever been four women to serve on the U. If women and men are capable of coming to the same conclusions, the question emerges concerning whether it matters that there have been so few.

To determine the facts, this paper discusses the gender composition of the Supreme Court and the extent to which, if any, that the meager female representation on the Court has mattered. Finally, a summary of the research and important findings concerning these issues are presented in the conclusion.

Supreme Court oodruff 1. There are more women than men in the nation's population, though, at Actually, the Governor General makes final appointment of these judges on behalf of the cabinet and advice of the Prime Minister. This process of appointment of judges to Canada's highest court is based on the Supreme Court Act, which was enacted by the federal government in line with its constitutional authority.

Life tenure by Supreme Court judges. Supreme Court Justices as regards their lifetime appointment status. Life tenure by Supreme Court judges has numerous significances as well as drawbacks. However, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages and, as such it should be taken into consideration.

Furthermore, the federal judges should receive significant pay as result of the importance of their job. This article includes the advantages and disadvantages of being a federal judge, as well as their tenure and salaries. The Pros Unquestionably, life occupation of office by federal judges has an extremely vital purpose: It protects the judges against the pressure which comes from politics as a result of sporadic accountability to voters. In contrast to numerous state judges, the federal judges do not need to get worried about coming up with funds for vote hunting campaigns or coming up with unpopular rulings that are legally correct but displeasing to the electorates.

An important job of the…… [Read More]. Make sure to discuss the constitutional issues on this ruling. Supreme Court is focusing on if same sex couples have the right to marry.

This is because a number of states had bans on issuing marriage licenses for these kinds of relationships. Instead, all applicants must be a male and female versus two of the same sex. In response, several U. District courts had conflicting rulings about the constitutionality and legality of these proceedings.

In some cases, they relied on the case precedent established under Baker v. This is a decision, where the Montana Supreme Court ruled that states have the right to create laws that determine the conditions for issues marriage licenses. The Supreme Court declined not to hear the decision and by default upheld the ruling.

This resulted in…… [Read More]. Former Supreme Court Justice Potter. During the trail, the prosecution is liable to produce sufficient evidence against the culprit, and it has to be proven that misrepresentation was false, but that the thief knew of the falsity.

The opinions and puffing are not included in false pretense. False Pretense also includes the shift of title. In the case of larceny by trick, the culprit deceives to deprive the owner of possession, not title.

Therefore false pretense is taken much different from larceny by trick, and the implication is taken separately. False Pretense is basically treated as an act of Theft. The act of false pretense is applied to the defendant, who obtained any chattel, money or valuable security from any other person with intent to defraud.

Trespass is going beyond the limit of what is considered…… [Read More]. Michigan vs Tyler the Supreme Court Decided. This came as a response to an accusation of "conspiracy to burn real property," where the prosecutors had collected and used evidence of numerous days after the firefighting operations. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the defendant, as evidence was collected without warrant in the subsequent days.

I think the process used by a gas chromatograph heating, etc. In my opinion, something like filtration should have been used to separate sand from the rest of the…… [Read More]. Supreme Court Argued on: October 5, Decided on: Facts Reasons for the Lawsuit: The appellant is the owner of a large motel Heart of Atlanta Motel Inc. He has filed a suit to perpetuate his policy of refusing rooms to Negroes.

The defendants or appellees are the United States et al. Arguments of the Appellant The appellant contends that in passing and enforcing the Civil Rights Act of , the congress has exceeded its power to regulate commerce under Art. The Act violates the Fifth Amendment as the appellant is deprived of the right to choose its customers and operate its business as it wishes,…… [Read More].

During the 70's and 80's some of these opportunities were eliminated by the actions of the Burger and Rehnquist courts but habeas corpus actions remain a major problem for both systems and our a source of much acrimony. In , Congress amended the federal habeas corpus statute in order to provide some clarification as to how habeas corpus was to be applied and interpreted nationwide.

The Eleventh Amendment and State Sovereign Immunity Litigation occurring under the 11th Amendment attempts to reconcile two competing ideas: Interpretations of the 11th Amendment have varied throughout the history of decisions on said issue but, presently, are a bar to unconsented suits by private citizens…… [Read More].

Establishing the Supreme Court. Constitution Between and , the Articles of Confederation determined what the federal government could and could not do School of Law, n. The Articles provided no authority for tax collection or regulation of commerce, a situation that left the states to fend for themselves amidst the often chaotic efforts to compete against one another.

Without tax revenues, the federal government had no way to pay soldiers fighting in the evolutionary War and many states ignored requests for financial contributions to the war effort. To resolve this issue, state representatives convened in Philadelphia to hammer out the U. Constitution, establish an executive and legislative branch for the federal government, and confer coercive power in order to enforce tax codes and interstate commerce regulations.

A third branch of the government, a federal judiciary, was also created during the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia Federal Judicial Center, n. The Founding Fathers were…… [Read More]. Religion and Birth Control at the Supreme Court" by The Editorial Board of The New York Times is written from a leftist perspective, which is immediately evident in the first line of the article, which states that the Senate Republicans are inflicting "harm" on the nation "by refusing to consider filling the Supreme Court vacancy" which Obama wants to fill with his nomination.

The piece is an anti-religion op-ed that condemns those who object to policies that impinge on their religious principles and integrity because their doing so "places burdens on others" Editorial Board, In other words, it is okay to burden the consciences of religious objectors, but it is not okay to burden others, i. Retrieved from Northwestern University Law website: Work Cited Bloomfield, Maxwell.

Constitutional Ideology and Progressive Fiction. Looking Back on Muller V. Print Goldstein, Leslie F. The Constitutional Rights of Women: Cases in Law and Social Change. University of Wisconsin Press, Hartman, Gary R, Roy M. Mersky, and Cindy L. Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Facts on File, Cash Distributing Company Inc.

Last retrieved on February 4, 2. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of Last retrieved on February 4, 3. Last retrieved on February 4, Works Cited "John G. Supreme Court of the United States. American Public Opinion and Law on Abortion.

CSA Website accessed April 10, Website accessed April 11, http: Accessed 4 September Retrieved March 28, , from Web site: American Public School Law 8th ed.

A Teacher's Guide to Education Law 4th ed. Board of Education I. Bibliography Chin, Jonathan and Alan Stern. References Adarand Constructors, Inc. Board of Education of Topeka, U. Rehnquist and state courts: Federalism revisited, The Western Political Quarterly, 45 3 , Works Cited Armor, David J.

Does It Really Exist? Retrieved August 29, , from. Department of Health and Human Services. Supreme Court View Full Essay. Work Cited "Dred Scott Case. Chase College of Law, March 22, Pitman The Miranda Ruling: Its Past, Present, and Future. Oxford University Press, The Supreme Court 12th ed. Politics, Analysis, and Alternatives, 4th Edition 4th ed. Public administration and law. Works Cited Brennan, William. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law.

Princeton University Press, Works Cited Cook, Phillip J. Effects on Crime and Violence. Details are being collected on murders, suicides in the U. Gun Violence in America: The Struggle for Control. Cocaine and prenatal Outcome. Pregnant women on drugs: Budget and Program Choices for Drug Control.

Reprint h-om Toward a Rational Drug Policy. The University of' Chicago Legal Forum,, pp. Comparison of pregnancy-specific Interventions to a Traditional treatment Program for Cocaine-addicted Pregnant Women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,, pp 16 1 , Retrieved March 26, , from Web site: LANE U.

Works Cited Mount, S. Constitution Online Web site: Retrieved March 2, from Oyez. Bibliography City of Sherrill, New York v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York, et al. A People's History of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court A to Z. Works Cited Batson v. Board of Education, U. Bass, FED App. This decision was upheld on appeal. The appellate court applied the precedent of Saucier v.

The Court stated, "A police officer's attempt to terminate a dangerous high-speed car chase that threatens the lives of innocent bystanders does not violate the Fourth Amendment, even when it places the fleeing motorist at risk of serious injury or death.

However, I agree with the Supreme Court's decision because a police officer is a trained professional and such actions as that taken by Scott are done not out of malice but out of a concern for the general safety of the public.

North Carolina, U. Argued February 22, -- Decided June 23, Findlaw. Hutchinson, VA, Persons, V. Standards in Determining Eighth Amendment Violations. Works Cited Bartholomew, K. Retrieved April 3, , from Questia database: The laws deprived the Cherokee Nation of basic human rights within their own tribal boundaries.

Sympathizing with the Cherokees, the court viewed them as a dependent entity within a larger nation. Home Flashcards Supreme Court Cases. Congress passed the new law, the Judiciary Act in , granting John Adams who was nearing the end of his presidency the ability to fill the court with judges sharing his Federalist views.

In a decision, the Supreme Court decided Marbury had a right to his commission. With Adams about to lose his post as president, he appointed many judges that fit his political view, in doing so, Marbury lost his position and took to court how this was not lawful in order to regain his post that was wrongfully taken from him.

In , the Georgia legislature split the land into 4 parts and sold them for a total of half a million dollars. The legislature approved this land act, however it was later revealed that Yazoo Land Act had been approved for bribes. After the scandal became public, the voters rejected most of the incumbents in the next election and repealed the law and voided the transaction.

Supreme Court held that a state law was unconstitutional 2. The Court reasoned that Peck was an innocent third party who had entered into two valid contracts: Peck thus fell outside the original fraud the Georgia legislature sought to undo in its repeal. It was the first case in which the Supreme Court ruled a state law unconstitutional, the decision also helped create a growing precedent for the sanctity of legal contracts, and hinted that Native Americans did not hold title to their own lands.

It Protected property rights throughout reading of Constitution. The Panic of was the first great financial panic which went back to the war of The first bank of the United States charter expired in The war of caused many banks to close and the economy was pressured.

The second bank of the United States was chartered in McCulloch refused to pay the tax. The state of Maryland had attempted to obstruct operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland.

The decision was unanimous for McCulloch; Chief Justice Marshall rejected the Maryland argument because he said that the Constitution was the instrument of the people, not the States. The Congress had the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers.

Marshall reasoned that because the Congress had more power not explicitly stated in the constitution that the states could not tax a federal institution employed by the execution of constitutional powers. One of the first and most important Supreme court cases under federal power that gave Congress the power to create national banks through implied rights. Relatively new nation trying to figure out just how much power the state government should have ,New Hampshire attempted to change the Dartmouth college into a state university , perhaps to get profit from it coming.

The charter set up rules for the School. Is it considered Constitutional for the state to change the charter of a college? This decision greatly influenced and encouraged business growth.

States cannot pass laws to impair charters, or the obligation of contracts.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

- The Dredd Scott Case The Dredd Scott case involved a landmark decision in the history of the Supreme Court, in the history of the United States the decision in this case was one of the most damaging statements in the history of the Supreme Court, involving the citizenship of a black person in the United States, and the constitutionality of the .

Privacy FAQs

- This paper discusses the contrast of two landmark United States (U.S.) Supreme Court cases that helped to clearly define how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution is interpreted, and analyzes the difference between the “Constitution” and “Constitutional Law.” Two cases that are referenced in this analysis are (1) Katz v.

About Our Ads

The Supreme Court – Essay Sample The Supreme Court of the United States is considered to be the last word on legal decisions, being highly selective about which cases it chooses to consider. It only accepts cases that have been through the lower courts and appeals processes until there are no other options and no satisfactory . Supreme Court Cases, Thematic Essay Words | 4 Pages. Thematic Essay-Supreme Court Cases The outcome of cases that have gone through the United States Supreme Court judicial branch have each had a major impact on how the laws and amendments of the United States Constitution are interpreted.

Cookie Info

Nov 17,  · Judicial review permits the Supreme Court to rule on a problem concerning rather a different branch of government's legislation is constitutional or not. This is a fundamental definition, yet somewhat generic if you will.5/5(72). Custom Supreme Court Cases Essay Writing Service || Supreme Court Cases Essay samples, help Supreme Court criminal cases may be either direct evidence or circumstantial evidence. Direct evidence is the form of a testimony, which proves a fact without any inference or presumption, establishes facts and is true.